|
Shifting
paradigms and finding workable reforms within the security sector
By Belle
Garcia-Hernandez / Posted 10 October 2011

It was in the middle of this
year that Balay Mindanaw and the Western Mindanao Command of the
AFP, headed by Maj. Gen. Raymundo Ferrer, finally conceptualized
another gathering of civil society and the military to once again
embark on policy discussions related to peace building, conflict
management and security issues in Mindanao. The deliberation wasn’t
difficult for the staff of Balay Mindanaw and for Gen. Ferrer
because discussion workshops had been organized several times in the
past, starting in 2007 and every year after that. However, each
gathering was a step to further enhance and improve the
participation of key leaders, and discussions of issues of the
succeeding forums were to further develop the issues at a higher
level of discussion for policy recommendations.
In retrospect, the need to go
to a policy advocacy through the conduct of policy discussion
workshops were considered after several peace and capacity-building
trainings were conducted with soldiers under the 103rd Infantry
Brigade based in the Lanao provinces. The soldiers were so happy
with the trainings that they recommended that all of them should
undergo the program, even under the next commanding officers.
The idea of integrating
peacebuilding modules into the military and police academic
institutions was discussed at length in 2007 between BMFI, Catholic
Relief Services (CRS), Institute for Peace and Development in
Mindanao (IPDM) of the Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of
Technology (MSU-IIT) and some budding colonels under the command of
Gen. Ferrer when he was still commander of the 6th Infantry Division
based in Central Mindanao. This proposal came along with the
discussion of putting peacebuilding and community development as
among the parameters of success or promotion of a soldier.
|
 |
|
L-R: Ariel
Hernandez, GOv. Khalid Dimaporo, Gov. Oscar Moreno, Lt. Gen.
Anthony Alcantara, Sec. Ging Deles, Lt. Gen. Raymundo
Ferrer, Senior Supt. Chiquito Malayo, Kaloy Manlupig. |
“We should think out of the
box at this time. We have been fighting battles for more that 40
years now but never won a single war,” said then Col. Pete Soria
(now a general) in front of his fellow senior military officers
during the first discussion group. With him at that time were LTC
Aquino, LTC Atal, LTC Lorenzo, LTC Hermoso, Col. Monilla, Col.
Javier and Gen. Ferrer. Among the civilians in the group were Ayi
Hernandez and Kaloy Manlupig of BMFI, Deng Giguiento of CRS, Ompong
Rodil of MSU-IIT, former Iligan Mayor Franklin Quijano, myself and
Charmaine Baconga, who were then on a research study on applied
conflict transformation and also facilitated training and research
works for the soldiers.
Reflections like these have
always prompted the military to think and do something more sensible
other that fighting. Thinking beyond the realm of military combat
operations has been a challenge for the soldiers, especially for
those who took the Operation Peace Course (OP Kors!) we at Balay
Mindanaw have been conducting. Somehow, they managed to think and
act that, yes, there are other options to achieve peace other than
fighting in a war.
The need for peacebuilding
among soldiers was later validated by the next series of discussion
workshops participated in by an increasing number of generals and
senior military officers. During these workshops, stories of
outcomes of community peace building were showcased and gave the
Army an idea about the local partnership, the impacts of the peace
courses and the need for policies to support the peace initiatives
on the ground.
 |
|
| Col. Charlie
Galves, Chief of Operations of the AFP, leads discussion on
the changing role of the CAFGUs and SCAAs. |
|
That was why in the 2010
forum, two policy proposals, helped developed by Gail Ilagan of the
Ateneo de Davao University, along with the transformational stories
of soldiers packaged into the “Soldiers for Peace” magazine
developed by Bobby Timonera, was presented to then Defense Secretary
Norberto Gonzalez for his commitment and signature. But Gonzales
never got to adopt the proposal, with busy days ahead as the
national elections came just three months later and a new
administration took over.
These gatherings about peace
policies in the security sector (which, aside from the military and
the police, also include the local government units and civil
society organizations) are actually part of the overall programmatic
initiative that engages the key stakeholders from the local to the
regional, national and even international levels who will take stock
for a meaningful transformation and partnership for empowered,
sustainable and peaceful communities and peoples.
Being initiated in Mindanao,
BMFI and WestMinCom are extending this initiative and thus inviting
other key stakeholders to be part of the processes of peacebuilding
with the security sector. This time around, a bigger group was
involved.
Despite Typhoon Pedring
hitting Metro Manila and many parts of Luzon, a total of 59
participants joined the policy discussion workshop last September 27
at the Asian Institute of Management (AIM) in Makati. The gathering
brought together key leaders and representatives from various
sectors – civil society, Armed Forces of the Philippines,
Philippine National Police, local chief executives, the Office of
the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process (OPAPP), National
Security Council (NSC), Australian Agency for International
Development (AusAID), Australian Embassy, The Asia Foundation and
Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Germany.
|
 |
|
Gov.
Dimaporo shares his experience on LGU-CSO collaboration. |
Organized by Balay
Mindanaw-International Center for Peace in Mindanaw (icPEACE), in
partnership with the AIM Team Energy Center, INCITEGov and the AFP
unified commands in Mindanao, this “momentous” policy dialogue,
as what Prof. Nieves Confessor expressed in her opening remarks in
behalf of AIM, was an exceptional opportunity to converse about
changing the way we think about peace, development and human
security. She further encouraged the delegates to “have a shift of
mind by building partnerships to rediscover the collective power of
the military, police, civil society organizations, communities and
government in peace building and community development.”
The objective of the forum
was to deepen the policy issues and discussions, not just to
exchange new and challenging views but moreso put forward concrete
recommendations for a shared responsibility, in the light of the new
Internal Peace and Security Plan (IPSP) and the National Security
Plan (NSP).
Lt. Gen. Anthony Alcantara,
the Deputy Chief of Staff of the AFP, in presenting his assessment
on the AFP plan said that the IPSP needs to be fully implemented
with multi-sectoral engagement with other groups and institutions.
This was concurred by the two governors who were in the panel of
reactors – Gov. Khalid Dimaporo of Lanao del Norte and Gov. Oscar
Moreno of Misamis Oriental – who strongly proposed a functional
Peace and Order Council (POC). Based on their respective
experiences, POCs should involve civil society partners in this
mandated mechanism of the local government units to resolve peace
and security issues in the local level and not waiting for the
national government to act on these.
Furthermore, Gen. Alcantara
revealed the joint security operation between the AFP and the PNP in
addressing violent threats, both from armed groups and lawless
elements. This plan was supplemented by Gen. Ferrer as he also
presented his opinion on the execution of the IPSP in the hope that
human rights, rule of law as well as the international humanitarian
law are being adhered to.
 |
|
| Thomas
Boelhke of the German military points out the need for
security forces to understand the International Humanitarian
Law (IHL). |
|
The participation of the
national government, represented by Presidential Assistant on the
Peace Process Teresita Quintos-Deles, and the non-government
organizations is essential in forums like this one. Secretary Deles,
who also came from the ranks of the NGOs before joining government
(first during the Arroyo administration and now under Aquino),
stressed what is essential to be reformed in our security force as
it relates to the peace processes in Mindanao. Thus she
straightforwardly brought the importance of what she called “C.A.T.C.H.”
as the guiding principles in working for policies related to
security sector reform: “Closure” of the strategies,
policies and laws by previous administrations and determined to
resolve issued brought about by the impacts of Martial Law,
All-out-War policies and the like; “Adequate capacities”
needed by the security sector towards building peace; “Terrorism
and lawless elements” be averted and prevented, adherence to Ceasefire
and other disciplines of uniformed forces; “Hopeful and
Hardwork” for a peace agreement. In addition, she articulated
the cross-cutting needs of a “civilian democratic oversight” and
a “gender perspective” in conflict management.
Kaloy Manlupig, President of
Balay Mindanaw representing the Mindanao Peace Advocates Conference
(MPAC), stressed more that the paradigm shift should be done in all
groups under the security sector (LGU, military, police, CSOs and
communities) who are embroiled in the overall issue of peace and
security. This, he said, will further “sustain the momentum and
protect the gains” of what has been started many years ago, no
matter how small they are.
After the dialogue with the
different representatives, the delegates went to different focus
group discussions and came back to the plennary with five major
recommendations: (1) professionalize if not demobilize the Citizens
Armed Forces Geographical Units (CAFGU), professionalize state
combatants, and engage non-state combatants in socio-economic
reconstructions, holding fast on human rights and international
humanitarian laws; (2) integrate peacebuilding and conflict
management modules into the formal curriculum of the military, LGUs
and police; (3) recognition of peace efforts to be adopted into the
merit system or promotion and establish an independent peace
award-giving body to distinguish paramount peace initiatives; (4)
creation of civilian oversight of the IPSP and NSP with
consideration of building capacities of this oversight; and (5)
capacitate Provincial Peace and Order Council (PPOCs) as one
effective mechanism to be strengthened by the multi-stakeholdership
and appoint regional POC chairpersons who will lead joint
partnerships and directions in addressing peace and security issues.
|
 |
|
The
facilitation and documentation team, composed of BMFI and
AIM staff, poses after the forum. |
Having participated and heard
the various critical inputs from the forum delegates,
representatives from the international community (the Australian Aid
and Australian Embassy, The Asia Foundation, the Armed Forces of the
Federal Republic of Germany) conveyed their support and challenged
the body to continue and pursue more reforms, recognizing the
already huge and noble efforts done as having an important effect in
the overall campaign for peace.
Ayi Hernandez, who
proficiently facilitated the discussion, presented in summary that
the delegates clearly shared a common goal of “transforming the
security sector into a sector of sustainable peace builders and
peace champions, optimizing the local partnerships of communities
and peoples for policy reforms.” The group’s recommendations as
contained in the diagram below, he said, will be further presented
to the Office of the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process,
Department of National Defense, Department of Interior and Local
Government and other key stakeholders in the security sector reform.
A Steering Committee is being set up to look further into the major
directions of this kind of security sector reform initiative,
especially in implementing these initiatives at the local level,
particularly in Lanao del Norte and Misamis Oriental.
|
|